'It's just a mucocele': a case report of a massive appendiceal mucocele presenting as a left upper quadrant mass.

Tumours of the appendix are very rare tumours that can and often present with a mucocele. This is a case report highlighting the associated pathology of appendix tumours and the management of a large mucocele. Specifically, how a right hemicolectomy is very rarely needed in these cases regardless of size and local anatomical relationships and some important considerations for the practicing surgeon in the non-tertiary centre that encounters a case like this.

Clinicopathologic features and diagnostic challenges of small cluster pattern appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors.

Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can present with various growth patterns including the traditional triad of histologic patterns-insular, trabecular and tubular. A small cluster pattern was also found in this study and the literature on this specific morphology is limited. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive review of appendiceal NENs from our institution over a ten-year period. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from medical records. Immunohistochemical stains were performed with antibodies specific for synaptophysin, chromogranin, INSM1, CD56, serotonin and peptide YY. The small cluster pattern was found in 29.4 % of all cases evaluated. The tumor cells in these cases were predominantly located at the distal tip of the appendix, associated with fibrous obliteration. These tumors were smaller in size and tended towards less advanced tumor stage, with reduced incidence of lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion. Chromogranin expression was identified in 76 % of these cases. There is a heterogeneous hormone profile with 46.7 % serotonin and 33.3 % peptide YY. In conclusion, the small cluster pattern NENs present with unique histological features and hormone expression profile. Among the various neuroendocrine markers, INSM1 showed superior diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity and minimal non-specific staining.

Confined Low Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm With Coexisting Distant Metastasis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are tumors with dysplastic mucinous epithelium, a pushing growth pattern but no infiltrative invasion to the appendiceal wall. Some AMNs are associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei, characterized by intraperitoneal mucinous involvement. Recent studies have demonstrated that LAMNs confined to the appendix have low or no risk for disease recurrence, progression, and peritoneal involvement during follow up. CASE REPORT: Here, we present two extremely rare cases with confined low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (pTis and pT3) and simultaneous extraperitoneal subcutaneous or ovary involvement at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our cases demonstrate that although the primary tumor is limited to the appendix, coexisting distant metastasis may occur on very rare occasions.

Incidental appendiceal neoplasms: Single-centre results.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens may reveal malignancies. Based on these results, either appendectomy is sufficient or sometimes a further treatment protocol can be needed. In this study, malignancy-diagnosed cases on appendectomy specimen were examined. METHODS: Patients who underwent appendectomy between January 2013 and December 2018 with a pre-diagnosis of acute appendicitis were evaluated retrospectively and those cases with malignancy were included in the study. Patients' age, sex, tumor type, tumor diameter, tumor grade, tumor localization, surgical margin, Ki-67 index, state of lymphovascular invasion, state of peri-neural invasion, and follow-up period duration were recorded. RESULTS: On examination of 2336 appendectomy specimens, 16 patients (0.7%) were found to have neuroendocrine tumors (NET), 11 patients (0.5%) were found to have low-grade mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), and five patients (0.2%) were found to have primary appendix carcinomas. Appendix tumors usually present with acute appendicitis symptoms. Despite re-operation with right hemicolectomy (RHC) being required in the treatment of adenocarcinoma cases, appendectomy provides adequate treatment in most cases with NET and LAMN. With these tumors, which usually have a benign prognosis, it is important to perform the necessary screening in the postoperative period and not to interrupt follow-up.

Incidence of occult appendiceal neoplasm in patients over 40 years with acute appendicitis: A single-institution review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of occult appendiceal neoplasm in patients aged 40 years and over who underwent appendicectomy for appendicitis. METHODS: The clinical coding electronic database was used to identify patients aged 40 years and over who were diagnosed with appendicitis from September 2010 to September 2022. Patients were included if they were managed operatively. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Modified Monash category 3 (large rural town). PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 40 years and over undergoing appendicectomy for appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of appendiceal neoplasm within appendicectomy specimen. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients aged 40 years and over underwent appendicectomy, with a median age of 53 years (range 40-95). Nineteen patients (7%) were found to have a primary neoplastic lesion within the appendix: seven neuroendocrine neoplasms (37%), six sessile serrated lesions (32%), two colonic-type adenocarcinoma (11%), two goblet cell adenocarcinoma (11%) and two appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (11%). Additionally, one patient had a metastatic adenocarcinoma of pancreaticobiliary aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: Occult appendiceal neoplasm was higher than reported in the literature in our cohort. This would support appendicectomy as the treatment of choice for patients aged 40 years and over with acute appendicitis and caution against nonoperative management in this demographic.

Incidental presentation of appendix neuroendocrine tumor: Long-term results from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Appendix neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are the most common tumors of the appendix and are most often diagnosed incidentally. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate appendix NETs diagnosed incidentally in our clinic. METHODS: Of 8304 patients who underwent appendectomy with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Ankara Training and Re-search Hospital, General Surgery Clinic between January 2009 and January 2022, 33 had histopathology results evaluated as appendix NET, and a retrospective analysis was made of these cases. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, tumor infiltration, tumor location, tumor size, surgical margin, tumor World Health Organization grade, surgery performed, lymph node metastasis, Ki67 index, number of mitosis, follow-up time, and survival. RESULTS: The rate of appendix NET was found to be 0.4%. The 33 cases comprised 15 (45.5%) males and 18 (54.5%) females with a mean age of 35.48 years (range: 16-84 years). Positive surgical margin was determined in 1 (3.03%) case, in which right hemicolectomy was performed. All other cases were followed up after appendectomy. The median follow-up was 89 (7-145) months. No recurrence was observed in any case. Mortality developed during follow-up in one case due to non-tumoral causes. CONCLUSION: Appendix NETs are generally asymptomatic and appear incidentally after appendectomy due to acute appendicitis. Appendix NETs diagnosed incidentally are generally below 2 cm and have a good prognosis.

The Promise of Epigenetics Research in the Treatment of Appendiceal Neoplasms.

Appendiceal cancers (AC) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies. Historically, appendiceal neoplasms have been grouped with colorectal cancers (CRC), and treatment strategies have been modeled after CRC management guidelines due to their structural similarities and anatomical proximity. However, the two have marked differences in biological behavior and treatment response, and evidence suggests significant discrepancies in their respective genetic profiles. In addition, while the WHO classification for appendiceal cancers is currently based on traditional histopathological criteria, studies have demonstrated that histomorphology does not correlate with survival or treatment response in AC. Due to their rarity, appendiceal cancers have not been studied as extensively as other gastrointestinal cancers. However, their incidence has been increasing steadily over the past decade, making it crucial to identify new and more effective strategies for detection and treatment. Recent efforts to map and understand the molecular landscape of appendiceal cancers have unearthed a wealth of information that has made it evident that appendiceal cancers possess a unique molecular profile, distinct from other gastrointestinal cancers. This review focuses on the epigenetic landscape of epithelial appendiceal cancers and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge of epigenetic changes across different appendiceal cancer subtypes, highlighting the challenges as well as the promise of employing epigenetics in the quest for the detection of biomarkers, therapeutic targets, surveillance markers, and predictors of treatment response and survival in epithelial appendiceal neoplasms.

Neoplasms of the Appendix.

BACKGROUND: Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochranedatabases. RESULTS: 0.5% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arise in the appendix. Their treatment depends on their histopathologicalclassification and tumor stage. The mucosal epithelium gives rise to adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, adenocarcinomas,goblet-cell adenocarcinomas, and mucinous neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms originate in neuroectodermal tissue. Adenomasof the appendix can usually be definitively treated by appendectomy. Mucinous neoplasms, depending on their tumorstage, may require additional cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC). Adeno -carcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomas can metastasize via the lymphatic vessels and the bloodstream and should thereforebe treated by oncological right hemicolectomy. Approximately 80% of neuroendocrine tumors are less than 1 cm in diameterwhen diagnosed and can therefore be adequately treated by appendectomy; right hemicolectomy is recommended if the patienthas risk factors for metastasis via the lymphatic vessels. Systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to be beneficial forappendiceal neoplasms in prospective, randomized trials; it is recommended for adenocarcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomasof stage III or higher, in analogy to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

[Incidental finding of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms]. / Zufallsbefund muzinöse Neoplasie der Appendix.

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are rare and are diagnosed in at least 0.13% of appendectomies in Germany, although significant underreporting is likely. Perforation of the tumors can result in abdominal mucinous collections, so-called pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). The challenge in the treatment of LAMN is the adequate approach to the incidental finding of these tumors. If a mucinous neoplasm is preoperatively suspected in cases of an acute condition, usually appendicitis, it must be weighed up whether a conservative approach is justifiable or whether immediate appendectomy is necessary. If this is the case, an intraoperative perforation of the appendix must be avoided and the complete abdominal cavity must be inspected for mucin deposits. If conservative treatment is possible, further treatment should take place at a specialized center. If the neoplasm is first found incidentally during surgery, perforation of the appendix should also be avoided and the entire abdominal cavity should be inspected for a PMP. If a PMP is present cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) should be performed in a specialized center. If LAMN are found during the postoperative histological work-up, it should be evaluated whether a perforation was present and mucin collections are noted in the surgical report. In the case of LAMN without evidence of a PMP, appendectomy is the adequate treatment. In cases of intra-abdominal mucinous collections, samples should be taken and further treatment should be performed at a center with sufficient expertise. An ileocecal resection or oncological hemicolectomy is not indicated. After adequate treatment, all patients should receive a follow-up using cross-sectional imaging (preferably magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) and determination of the tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125.

Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Appendix in Children and Adolescents: A Clinicopathologic Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pediatric neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the GI tract are rare and appendiceal NET are typically incidental. Few studies have been done in the pediatric population and practice guidelines are mainly based on adult data. There are currently no diagnostic studies specific for NET. Our study aimed to identify clinical, radiological, and pathological findings in pediatric appendiceal NET, test criteria for follow up surgical treatment, review potential prognostic pathological findings, and possible pre-operative diagnostic radiological studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data search was conducted for well-differentiated NET of the appendix in patients ≤21 years between 1/1/2003 and 7/1/2022. Available clinical, radiologic, pathological, and follow-up information was recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with appendiceal NET were identified. No masses were reported in the patients who underwent presurgical imaging. Appendectomy samples showed NET (0.2->4 cm), most located in the tip. Most cases were WHO G1 (34/37), with negative margins (n = 25). Sixteen cases extended to the subserosa/mesoappendix (pT3). Lymphovascular (6), perineural (2), and both lymphovascular and perineural invasion were also noted (2). The specified tumor stages were pT1 (10/37), pT3 (16/37), and pT4 (4/37). Patients who underwent laboratory testing for chromogranin A (20) and urine 5HIAA (11) had normal limits. Subsequent surgical resection was recommended in 13 cases and performed in 11. To date, all patients have no recurrent or additional metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that all pediatric well-differentiated appendiceal NET were incidentally found as part of acute appendicitis management. Most NET were localized with low-grade histology. Our small cohort support the previously suggested management guidelines with follow up resection in certain cases. Our radiologic review didn't identify a best modality for NET. Comparing cases with and without metastatic disease, no tumors under 1 cm had metastasis, but serosal and perineural invasion along with G2 status were associated with metastasis in our limited study.

An Update on Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

The mainstay of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (aNEN) treatment is surgery, based on simple appendectomy or right-sided hemicolectomy with lymphadenectomy (RHC). The majority of aNENs are adequately treated with appendectomy, but current guidelines have poor accuracy in terms of selecting patients requiring RHC, especially in aNENs 1-2 cm in size. Simple appendectomy is curative for appendiceal NETs (G1-G2) < 1 cm (if the resection status is R0), whereas RHC with lymph node dissection is recommended in tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter, based on the high risk of nodal metastases in these cases. The clinical management of aNENs 1-2 cm in size is more controversial because lymph node or distant metastases are uncommon but possible. In our opinion, patients with tumor size > 15 mm or with grading G2 (according to WHO 2010) and/or lympho-vascular invasion should be referred for radicalization with RHC. However, decision-making in these cases should include discussion within a multidisciplinary tumor board at referral centers with the aim of offering each patient a tailored treatment, also considering that relatively young patients with long-life expectancy represent the majority of cases.

Cecal-Colon Intussusception due to Appendiceal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

Intussusception is a rare presentation in adults and describes when one portion of the intestine telescopes into another portion. Intussusception is associated with malignancies serving as the lead point in adults. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are uncommon tumors often incidentally discovered during appendectomy procedures to manage acute appendicitis. Here we present a case report of an instance of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix that manifested as a large bowel obstruction with intussusception limited to the colon, underscoring the possibility of concurrent intussusception and mucinous neoplasms. The case highlights the importance of meticulous diagnostic evaluation and management, particularly without well-defined treatment protocols. Appropriate diagnostic workup and management, including surgical intervention, are critical for patient outcomes and overall prognosis. The study recommends that patients diagnosed with confirmed or suspected appendiceal neoplasms undergo upfront oncologic resection where aggressive malignancy is a concern. Colonoscopy should be performed postoperatively for all patients to identify synchronous lesions.

Four cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei with ovarian tumors at our hospital.

We describe four cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) that were diagnosed and treated at our hospital.Case 1: A 26-year-old woman with a large multicystic ovarian tumor and massive ascites was diagnosed with PMP originating from a borderline mucinous ovarian tumor. She underwent fertility-preserving staging laparotomy and was treated with three courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There has been no recurrence in the 15 years since her first operation. Case 2: A 72-year-old woman with a giant ovarian tumor and massive ascites was diagnosed with PMP originating from low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN). After laparotomy, the patient was managed conservatively because she did not want aggressive treatment. She has remained asymptomatic with a small amount of ascites for 3 years. Case 3: A 82-year-old woman with ovarian tumors, massive ascites, and suspected PMP underwent emergency laparotomy due to appendiceal perforation and pan-peritonitis. She was diagnosed with PMP originating from LAMN. She has remained asymptomatic with a small amount of ascites for 2 years. Case 4: A 42-year-old woman with multicystic ovarian tumors and massive ascites underwent laparotomy. She was diagnosed with PMP originating from LAMN. Since multidisciplinary treatment was indicated and desired, the patient was referred to a specialized facility where cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was performed. The patient has done well since the treatment.Although most cases of PMP originate from mucinous tumors of the appendix, female patients with PMP often present with ovarian tumors and are commonly referred to gynecology clinics. It is therefore important for gynecologists to be familiar with PMP and to be able to diagnose it accurately and select the most suitable management including multidisciplinary treatments.

Role of Tumor-informed Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Assay in Informing Recurrence in Patients With Peritoneal Metastases From Colorectal and High-grade Appendix Cancer Undergoing Curative-intent Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of a personalized, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay in informing recurrence in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal (CRC) and high-grade appendix (HGA) cancer after curative cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). BACKGROUND: Over 50% of patients with CRC/HGA-PM recur after optimal CRS-HIPEC. The limited sensitivity of axial imaging and diagnostic biomarkers is a significant cause of delay in the detection of recurrence and initiation of further therapies. Plasma ctDNA has a promising role in monitoring response to treatment and/or recurrence after primary cancer resection. METHODS: Patients with CRC/HGA-PM who underwent curative CRS-HIPEC and serial postresection ctDNA assessments were included. Patients with rising postoperative ctDNA levels were compared with those with stable, undetectable ctDNA levels. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients with recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival, ctDNA sensitivity, lead time, and performance of ctDNA compared with carcinoembryonic antigen. RESULTS: One hundred thirty serial postresection ctDNA assessments [median 4, interquartile range (IQR), 3 to 5] were performed in 33 patients (n = 13 CRC, n = 20 HGA) who underwent completeness of cytoreduction-0/1 CRS with a median follow-up of 13 months. Of the 19 patients with rising ctDNA levels, 90% recurred versus 21% in the stable ctDNA group (n = 14, < 0.001). Median DFS in the rising ctDNA cohort was 11 months (IQR, 6 to 12) and not reached in the stable ( P = 0.01). A rising ctDNA level was the most significant factor associated with DFS (hazard ratio: 3.67, 95% CI: 1.06-12.66, P = 0.03). The sensitivity and specificity of rising ctDNA levels in predicting recurrence were 85% and 84.6%, respectively. The median ctDNA lead time was 3 months (IQR, 1 to 4). Carcinoembryonic antigen was less sensitive (50%) than ctDNA. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the clinical validity of serial ctDNA assessment as a strong prognostic biomarker in informing recurrence in patients with CRC/HGA-PM undergoing curative resection. It also holds promises for informing future clinical trial designs and further research.

Appendiceal neoplasms: Suspected findings and reports of 14 cases.

Background: Neoplastic lesions of the vermiform appendix are still considered to be rare, some studies suggest that appendix cancer may be on the rise, with an estimated incidence of 0.08-0.1% of all appendiceal specimens. The lifetime incidence of malignant appendiceal tumors ranges from 0.2 to 0.5%. Patients and Methods: Our study is applied at the Department of General Surgery at tertiary training and research hospital; 14 patients who had appendectomy or right hemicolectomy between December 2015 and April 2020 were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 52.3 ± 15.1 (range, 26-79) years. Gender of the patients were: five (35.7%) men and nine (64.3%) women. The clinical diagnosis was appendicitis without suspected findings in 11 (78.6%), appendicitis with suspected findings (appendiceal mass, etc.) in three (21.4%) of the patients, and there is no patient with asymptomatic or other rare findings. Surgeries applied for the patients were: nine (64.3%) underwent open appendectomy, four (28.6%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and one (7.1%) underwent open right hemicolectomy. Histopathologic results were as follows: five (35.7%) neuroendocrine neoplasm, eight (57.1%), noninvasive mucinous neoplasm, and one (7.1%) adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: While diagnosis and management of appendiceal pathology, surgeons should be familiar with suspected findings of appendiceal tumors and discuss them with patients to the possibility of histopathologic results.

Evaluation of factors predicting appendiceal tumoral lesions in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Tumoral lesions are a relatively rare cause of acute appendicitis. Accurate pre-operative diagnosis is essential to provide appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that may increase diagnostic rate of appendiceal tumoral lesions in patients undergoing appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2011 to 2020 was undertaken. Demographics, clinicopathologic findings, and pre-operative laboratory values were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to identify the factors that predict appendiceal tumoral lesions. RESULTS: A total of 1400 patients were included in the study, with median age of 32 (range, 18-88) years, and of whom 54.4% were male. Overall, 2.9% (n=40) of patients had appendiceal tumoral lesions. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (Odds Radio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.08) and WBC count (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) were independent predictors of appendiceal tumoral lesions. The optimal cutoff age was 37 years old (AUC: 0.79; sensitivity: 82.0%; specificity: 62.0%). WBC count <10×109/L was another independent predictive factor (AUC: 0.69, sensitivity: 74%; specificity: 60%). CONCLUSION: Predicting an appendiceal tumoral lesion preoperatively is critical to ensure a favorable post-operative outcome. Higher age and low WBC counts appear to be independent risk factors for an appendiceal tumoral lesion. In case of doubt and in the presence of these factors, wider resection should be favored over appendectomy only to provide a clear surgical margin.

Appendiceal tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei: current recommendations for clinical practice.

Appendiceal tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) are rare tumors. Perforated epithelial tumors of the appendix are the most common source of PMP. This disease is characterized by the presence of mucin of varying degrees of consistency, partially adherent to the surfaces. Appendiceal mucoceles themselves are also very rare and usually their treatment involves only a simple appendectomy. The aim of this study was to provide an up-to-date review of the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of these malignancies according to the current guidelines of The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the Blue Book of the Czech Society for Oncology of the Czech Medical Association of J. E. Purkyne (COS CLS JEP).